Page 2 |
||||||||||
Cleaning furnace convection section coils is a great difficulty because of the tight arrangements of tube banks and the close spacing of adjacent coil services. Unfortunately, convection coils are designed to achieve a certain level of performance, and maintenance issues like cleaning are not a designers key focus. Fouled furnace convection coils result in considerable flue gas heat losses resulting from just a few years of fouling buildup. Ammonia Plant Furnace Example Ammonia plants use extremely large amounts of fuel in fired furnaces and boilers with convection heat recovery. Simulation data for a 1790 STPD Ammonia plant furnace and convection section is illustrated in Figure 1, which uses over 40 Million US Dollars in natural gas fuel per year. Figure 1 illustrates a plant that has been operating about 15 years and for over 5 years without convection coil cleaning. The convection section includes the following convection coils. |
||||||||||
Table 1 Coil Description Coil Design Duty Operating Fouling MM Btu/Hr Factor, Ft2-Hr-Deg F/Btu Hot Convection Coils Mixed Feed Preheat 1826 Ft2 Bare 45.85 0.011365 Hot Process Air Preheat 1044 Ft2 Bare 15.94 0.011529 High Temp Steam Supht 1459 Ft2 Bare & 92.67 0.015048 38350 Ft2 Finned Cold Convection Coils Low Temp Steam Supht 27600 Ft2 Finned 75.70 0.008789 High Temp Nat Gas Prht 8400 Ft2 Finned 29.90 0.007754 Boiler Water Preheat 48840 Ft2 Finned 77.57 0.009868 Fuel Gas Preheat 3558 Ft2 Finned 8.60 0.004771 Cold Process Air Preheat 14978 Ft2 Finned 12.62 0.004306 |
||||||||||
Refer to Figure 1, (page 3), illustrating rigorous rating of the furnace coils using a process simulator and Chem-Engineering Services Heat-r-Rate-r furnace convection coil design, evaluation and rating software. The two programs were run simultaneously in trial-and-error calculations to develop the furnace thermodynamics, deriving the fouling factors (illustrated above) to closely match the individual coil performance for the convection coils actual current operation. The convection coil rating software enables the understanding of the extent of fouling of the individual convection section coils and permits the determination of the benefits of coil cleaning. A common maintenance approach in industry is to hire a cleaning company to clean the entire convection section during a plant shut-down. Hydroblasting is often used, but new techniques are available, including "dry-ice" (solid CO2) blasting with air as the propellant to avoid liquid damage to refractory blanket type wall insulation. As described earlier, access can be extremely difficult. For some furnace convection sections, large inspection and coil removal doors exist for tube pulling and maintenance, while in some plants cutting of openings must be done. Careful planning and coordination of a convection section cleaning project must consider access, safety of contract workers, disposal of blasting and fouling material and the degree of cleaning success. Because of the inaccessibility of surface areas within deep tube banks and the effects of masking from front and secondary rows of tubes, reduction in fouling factors of about 50% should be expected in calculations as a practical limit for cleaning restoration of coils that have been in service 5 years or longer for a "cleaned" condition. Figure 1 illustrates the base case furnace and convection section performance following years of operation without cleaning. Higher than design flue gas temperatures and lower than design coil outlet temperatures exist because of high load on the convection coils, with plant rate over 50% above original design. |
||||||||||
Previous Page |
Next Page |
|||||||||
Back to Process Engineering and Technology Articles |
||||||||||